The question intentionally left out the altitude of the vehicle in order to trick us into thinking it’s a harder question to answer than it really is. Contrary to the author’s attempted point, the correct answer to the question is not a matter of language ambiguity. The question cannot be answered without that information. The question in the quiz about flying airplanes over a park can be correctly answered with 3 pieces of information: the aircraft type, the park’s location, and the altitude. (Small drones are also required to not fly directly above other people.) Aircraft with people in them are required to fly higher than that, which thus defines an altitude threshold above which is considered outside of land-based public and private property boundaries. In a public park in the US, small drones are required to stay under 400 ft altitude above ground, inside the airspace of the park. Small drones need a remote pilot license, and drones large enough to carry a human require an actual aircraft pilot’s license just like any other airplane or helicopter. I’m using the US as an example because I live in the US, but many many countries have similar regulations. What about them? Both of those can violate air rights, and in the US both have FAA regulations that apply. However, the law simply doesn't agree with them, and a satellite is photographing your underwear as we speak! I'd venture a guess that if you asked the average property owner if airplanes could fly over their property and stare at them in their hot tubs, they'd say "no". These are not universal constraints on existence, just actual laws that people wrote down because nobody could agree on the details. You probably won't be home for dinner.) Similarly, in the US, the FAA decides who can fly over your property and how low. (You can see this in action if you fly your plane from Canada to do a low approach over the White House. It could have easily worked out some other way fly over our country without stopping for immigration, and we blow up your plane. The 15 countries it flew over are members of the ICAO, which delegated some of their sovereignty to the common good of easy air travel. But you can fly a plane across the globe without going through 15 separate immigration rituals, so for most practical purposes (obviously excluding things like no-fly zones or bomber planes) the plane is not "in" any of the areas it passes over.īut you were specifically instructed to not use any laws local to your jurisdiction, and that's why this can happen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |